Friday’s From the Historical Archive: Wartime Magazine Advertisements

I don’t want to be an ass in saying this comment, but really, I wonder how trains function in the United States. Commuter trains and subways, like the ones in New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Chicago, and other places across the country make sense to me. They are practical, and they don’t take too long. By the time I was twenty, I had been to the city a million times, all by train. We never drove. Driving took probably around the same time as the train, and you didn’t have to worry about parking, and tolls, and traffic. Taking the train is not too expensive, as well. It just makes sense. I can count the number of times I have gone to the city by car on one hand. And the first time was when I was twenty.
But how does Amtrak work? I’ve only been on Amtrak twice, going to Florida and back with my grandmother that has a minor phobia of planes. I’ve thought of taking the Lake Shore Limited to Chicago, but that is only because I like trains, and I think it would be cool to ride what was once known as “The Water Level Route.” But other than having a phobia of planes, and being a railfan, why would I want to take Amtrak? Searching up prices, I can get a round trip flight to Orlando for July 4th for $193. That ride takes two and a half hours. Or, with Amtrak, I could ride for twenty-two hours, and pay a whopping $423. Why would anyone want to pay more than double for a trip that takes more than seven times as long? In Japan I took the bullet train to Kyoto, which in terms of time and price is very close to flying. Close enough to compete, anyways. But then that just goes back to the usual argument that the US wanted their Interstate System, while other countries, especially Japan, concentrated on rail.
That sort of demonstrates my mind-set when I think about trains. There are some times when I read about their history, that I am completely and utterly baffled by how important they once were. Rail was the way that products and people were transported. And during World War II, trains were an integral part of the war effort. The New York Central operated personnel trains, mail trains, equipment freight, and even hospital trains. An average of two million troops per month were transported over the NY Central system during WW2. I always love looking at old advertisements, so today I have a collection of old New York Central magazine advertisements from the war years. Each advertisement depicts a different scene or use for the wartime trains: from riding the 20th Century Limited, to troop trains, to the fully equipped surgery suite on an army hospital train.




It is interesting to note that part of the reason why we have the Interstate System today can be attributed to the war. President Eisenhower pushed for the Interstate System, especially after experiencing the German autobahn while he served in World War II. He had also been associated with the Transcontinental Motor Convoy which drove from Washington DC to San Francisco, and took sixty-two days. That sort of puts it in perspective, how roads in between cities were back then. Today if you drove non-stop and managed to avoid traffic, you could drive that in two days. Sixty-two days, no wonder why people took the train!
Tags: 20th century limited, advertisements, amtrak, bullet train, freight, friday's from the historical archive, hospital train, japan, lake shore limited, new york central, world war two








June 4th, 2010 at 4:37 pm
Thanks for those great ads!
As for train vs. plane today, you also have to factor in travel time from center city (aka “downtown”) to the airport and security time at the airport. Let’s say that adds two hours on departure and another hour on arrival. For a flight from NY to FL that’s not much of a consideration. But for a flight from NY to Boston or DC it’s likely to be the better [sic] part of the trip. In other words, you’d spend more time getting to and from the plane than in the air. Which is why high-speed rail (really high speed, not just the Acela) might still happen in the northeast corridor. And maybe SF to LA.
FWIW, I grew up in the City in the 50s in a family that never had a car. Ever. Of course in NYC you don’t need one but, back then, it was possible to even go on vacation without one. We’d take the New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad to Mom’s relatives in Western Mass or the Pennsylvania Railroad to Dad’s relatives in Pittsburgh. For all I know, we may have left from New York’s historic, and doomed, Penn Station.
Fast-forward several decades and one of my cousins was living in a apartment in Pittsburgh’s historic Penn Station. See http://www.thepennsylvanian.com/
[Reply]
June 7th, 2010 at 10:42 am
Truth. MY WIFE and I are looking at a trip to Chicago later this year, and I was checking prices on AMTRAK because we both think it would be an interesting ride. Way too high.
[Reply]
December 24th, 2010 at 12:45 pm
[...] you liked these ads, check out another set of New York Central vintage ads from World War II that I posted back in [...]